During a recent business trip to Rome, I had some weekend time to be a tourist. How can anyone not admire the incredible structural achievements of Italian sculptors, artists and architects? Theres the Pantheon, the Coliseum, the Spanish steps and all the wonderful piazzas. And of course, there are all of the churches, including St. Peters Basilica in the Vatican.
The structure of these churches, including their tall columns and ornate decorations, is breathtaking. Inside each church I visited, as I gazed at the high ceilings, I asked myself this question: How much of this beauty built by people centuries before us was the result of art, craft or science? And similarly, for todays organizations implementing the various component methodologies of the performance management framework (e.g., dashboards, scorecards, strategy maps, costing models and customer intelligence reporting), how much is art, craft or science?
Balancing a Smart and Healthy Organization
Despite my Newtonian view, probably shared by a vast majority in business and IT, that an organization is a big machine that simply needs more gears, pulleys and dials to better operate it, many of my blogs and articles describe the importance of behavioral change management. I believe you have to be a psychologist and sociologist to successfully implement performance management. However, I realize there is also a Darwinian view: that an organization is like an organism, and we must acknowledge its sense-and-respond behavior.
A Newtonian organization relies on fact-based information to make it smarter. A Darwinian organization relies on employee-centric programs and policies for improving morale to make it smarter. A balance of the Newtonian and Darwinian management styles is needed to be both smart and healthy. But please indulge me for the next few paragraphs, and lets explore how science in the form of business analytics can be inserted into performance management methodologies to make it smarter.
The Power of Business Analytics
- If you are a retail merchandiser with many stores and consumer items, you can use predictive analytics to continuously replenish a dynamically optimal level of inventory without having too many items languishing on the shelves or any stock-out items.
- If you are a hardware manufacturer and your suppliers are delivering component parts late, your order-handling representatives can demand-shape customer orders by offering them slightly different product configurations with a small discount for the parts you have in stock.
- If you are a consumer packaged goods producer, you can run short-duration marketing campaigns, target and predict the desired sales mix volume, and instantly harmonize your production levels to optimize costs.
- If you are a business-to-consumer service, like a bank or telecommunications firm, you can analyze the purchase history and preferences of your customer micro-segments, and even of each customer. With that information combined with individual customer profitability information, you could tailor service offerings to up sell and cross-sell to customers to optimize future sales and profits.
- If you are a human resources manager seeking to increase employee retention, you could analyze the characteristics and traits of employees who have left your organization. The variables might include their ages, the frequency and amount of their salary increases, their lengths of employment and dozens of others. You could then apply these patterns to your existing workforce to predict and order a list of the next most likely employees to resign (plus their reasons) and potentially intervene to prevent their departures for those valuable employees you wish to retain.
- If you are a CEO desiring to better select and align your most influential balanced scorecards key performance indicators, you could continuously test the degree of statistical correlation between the cause-and-effect leading to lagging KPIs. This way you can keep improving which KPIs to monitor and accordingly apply weights to influence and align your employees behavior with the strategic objectives.
The Time for Scientific Management is Now
Frederick Winslow Taylor, a luminary of industrial engineers, pioneered scientific management methods in the 1890s to systematically organize work. His techniques helped make Henry Ford wealthy when Fords automobile company applied these methods to divide labor into specialized skill sets in a sequential production line, and to set stopwatch-measured time standards as target goals to monitor employee production rates. During the same period, Alexander Hamilton Church, an English accountant, designed a method of measuring cost accounting variances to measure the favorable and unfavorable cost impact of faster or slower production speeds compared to the expected standard cost.
Since then, management science has gradually continued to support better decision-making and improve an enterprises performance. However, the time has come to escalate the application of management science by leveraging business analytics.
An organization should be viewed as a broad series of ongoing laboratory experiments to refine its decision-making. Managers at all levels should be formulating ideas and theories of what will best improve the organizations performance. Based on these theories, the organization should constantly test the effects of its actions for validation. Scientists live by experimentation and test analysis. An organization should, too, whether it is a commercial business, public sector government agency or ministry.
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Information Management content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access