Economic challenges continue to plague insurers, affecting their day-to-day decisions, their corporate objectives and even as their budget projections for 2010 and beyond. With IT budgets are flat or slightly up, this leaves CIOs with even more important decisions to make and policies to set. CIOs, tech vendors and industry experts gathered at IASA’s annual EDGE conference mid-September to share their thoughts about these issues. 
At one of the IASA EDGE Executive Discussion Breakout Sessions, Steven Boyd, CIO of Arrowhead General Insurance Agency, led a candid discussion among a group of insurance technology professionals trying to tackle economic and business challenges affecting IT spend. While the majority of the industry experts who attended the conference expect 2011 budgets to go up, they confirmed that 2010 budgets will remain the same, and where they spend that limited amount of money will vary. Matthew Josefowicz, director of insurance at Novarica, said IT is taking on projects that have quick return, and is heavily evaluating systems and processes right now. 

Virtualization and Cloud Computing


One area in which insurers are investing is virtualization, Josefowicz said. “There is a lot of server virtualization going on,” he says. “Many people are turning their mainframes to Linux.” 
One such company investigating virtualization is Princeton Insurance. “We are in the planning stages—we are looking at which servers are best to virtualize,” said Darby O’Neill, the insurer’s CIO. “The company we hired has to show cost savings and results.”
Cost savings is important to Tower Hill Insurance Group, which has a large VM farm, said Brian Elsmore, CIO. However, he warned, “If you are not careful, it’s cheap on the front end, but it can become very expensive on the back end.” 
The discussion about virtualization naturally progressed into talk about cloud computing, which ISCS Inc. president Andy Scurto claimed will be the next “dot-com.” “Insurers will embrace [cloud computing] and it’s safe to say they are not that crazy.”
O’Neill, who said her No. 1 priority is data quality and integration, is not quite ready to embrace it. “There is no way I am putting my data out there,” she said, which was accompanied by a few nods of agreement from other CIOs in the room. 
Boyd, however, sees some value in it. “This model is good for small to mid-sized companies versus an on-premise solution,” he said.
Novarica’s Josefowicz echoed the thought. “Comparatively, the power of the on-demand model has a lot of appeal, especially when you are doing multi-year loss runs,” he said. “You can ship data out and get it back. Larger cloud W.2.0—where you ship some here and some there—is not being embraced by insurance companies, and I don’t expect it to be.”

Open Source


A hot topic that emerged within the group was Open Source technologies, and their potential as the foundation for viable development efforts. Tower Hill’s Elsmore said much of its development is being done using Open Source. But, Dave Hanley, VP operations and business development at Insurance Systems Inc., said the industry needed to know more about the technology’s reputation. 
“Open Source has the reputation as being for the yogurt-and-nut-loving, tree-hugging crowd,” answered Phil Hargrove, insurance technology adviser at Vertafore Inc. “Yet, all the brilliant shops are contributing to this,” he said. “IBM is even embracing it. The fact is that it is well-tested software.”
Craig Lowenthal, EVP and CIO at New York Marine and General Insurance Co., said his comfort level was challenged using Open Source. Hargrove suggested that IT execs should institute a policy as to how they will use it (i.e. governance). “There are also copyright laws coming out, so you need to control how it’s implemented,” he said. “Know what you are getting into.”

Legacy Systems


Arrowhead’s Boyd posed the question about legacy systems, and whether insurers currently are replacing or maintaining those systems. The consensus among session attendees was that they are working with what they have.  
“You want to leverage any investments you make,” Lowenthal said. “You have to watch maintenance costs. Plus, when you [make a huge systems change] and try to shove something down peoples’ throats — they run away.”
Boyd agreed. “It’s important not to shoehorn something. We have a Wiki on our IS system, and it ended up holding hundreds of documents so we said ship it (porting into the legacy system).”
On the other side, Great American Insurance Co. is currently involved with a major legacy system replacement. “Since we started three years ago, we keep close tabs on it,” said Jane Bracken, SVP for Business Unit Enablement at the insurance company. “You have to manage expectations — that’s one of the top three challenges.”

Social Networking


CIOs in the session agreed that another challenge facing the industry at large is social networking, and how to—or even whether to—leverage it. 
“You need to look at it as part of a distributed strategy,” Lowenthal said. “If you want to attract agents and do business in different ways it’s important to think about it.”
Liberty International Underwriters is starting to use Twitter and Facebook, said a cautious Carlos Correa, AVP, U.S. technology manager. “We’ll see how it goes.”
Other challenges and concerns include productivity issues among employees spending too much work time on social networking sites, and the need for strict oversight of how and what employees communicate about company business using the medium.

Aligning Business and IT


The business/IT relationship has long been a complex issue to sort out. “When I first joined the company, IT and business was very separated,” said Tower Hill’s Elsmore. “Now, IT is part of the decision-making process, and has turned into an applicable part of the business.”
He said he explores new lines of business for his company, and that although the job isn’t his, the responsibility ultimately falls back in his lap.
“Being a strategic player on the business side is important,” Princeton’s O’Neill added. “You have to come to the table knowing about the business.”
Boyd has seen a change in the relationship as well. “We are actually moving some IT people to other business functions.”
While the conclusion varied as to whether it’s easier to manage scope creep with a vendor than an internal staff, the discussion participants did agree that IT needs to engage business earlier in the process. 
This article can also be found at InsuranceNetworking.com.

Register or login for access to this item and much more

All Information Management content is archived after seven days.

Community members receive:
  • All recent and archived articles
  • Conference offers and updates
  • A full menu of enewsletter options
  • Web seminars, white papers, ebooks

Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access