MAY 1, 2012 4:19am ET

Related Links

Many Enterprises Fill Skills Gap with ‘Citizen Developers’
August 27, 2014
Building an Advanced-Analytics Center of Excellence
August 25, 2014
Unleashing the Value of Advanced Analytics in Insurance
August 25, 2014

Web Seminars

Why Data Virtualization Can Save the Data Warehouse
September 17, 2014
Essential Guide to Using Data Virtualization for Big Data Analytics
September 24, 2014
column

Data Management is Based on Philosophy, Not Science

Print
Reprints
Email

There's a joke running around on Twitter that the definition of a data scientist is “a data analyst who lives in California.” I'm sure the good natured folks of the Golden State will not object to me bringing this up to make a point. The point is: Thinking purely in terms of marketing, which is a better title -- data scientist or data philosopher?

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?

Advertisement

Comments (15)
Absolutely the nerdiest thing I will ready today... and I loved it. What you lay out is not so much that data management is a science, but actually a tool of science. So what then is data analysis? Research?

I for one, love the term 'data scientist'. I think it lends credibility to a growing field of analysts.

Thank you for writing this article!

Posted by Jody C | Tuesday, May 01 2012 at 10:51AM ET
I have a couple of philosophy degrees, primarily focused on epistemology, logic, and math. I think you're dead on, and I probably do more straightforward philosophy in a week than my counterparts in academia. There's three areas I use my education all the time:

1. Data modeling is classic foundational analysis. Its a mix of semantics and logic, and while it may look to outsiders like metaphysics, its not metaphysical at all. See e.g. Montague's project at UCLA to reduce language to logic. 2. Business Intelligence is all about justification - which is the branch of philosophy called Epistemology - or how we *know* that something is the case. Classically "knowledge" is defined as "justified true belief" but there are many theories of how this works. I'm personally more of what's called a "reliabilist." 3. MDM is actually the problem of meaning, or how it is that you can discover the referent of two senses. The classic example is "'the morning star' denotes 'venus'" and "'the evening star' denotes 'venus'", but "morning star" and "evening star" are not the same thing, in much the same way one shouldn't use maiden name and married name or mailing address or billing address interchangeably.

There are a few of the gray-hairs with wing-backed chairs left, sadly fewer than there used to be. But for the most part the philosophers you're referring to are as likely to be influencing people at Xerox PARC, SRI or Microsoft as they are to be teaching introductory logic for the 30th time.

Posted by David G | Tuesday, May 01 2012 at 11:10AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.