APR 10, 2012 5:40am ET

Related Links

Microsoft CEO Nadella Unveils Data-Analysis Tools for Companies
April 17, 2014
Gartner: CEOs Focus on Tech-Related Business Growth in 2014
April 17, 2014
Why You Need A Chief Information Security Officer
April 16, 2014

Web Seminars

April 29: Create a data protection strategy with open, software-defined storage
April 29, 2014
New Best Practices To Manage Customer Information
May 7, 2014
May 13: Cost-effective, scale-out backup in 1 solution
May 13, 2014
column

Big Data and the Coming Conceptual Model Revolution

Print
Reprints
Email

Conceptual modeling, or semantic modeling if you like, is a rather nebulous area in data management. There seems to be a lot of agreement that it is needed, some disagreement about what it is, and little understanding of how to do it. Yet I believe we are now at a point where we will be forced to deal with it in a far more serious way than we have in the past.

Definitional Problems

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?

Advertisement

Comments (8)
Hi, Malcolm. Really interesting post. I have a few questions / comments:

1) While I understand your point that the conceptual model should be separate from the logical & physical models, mustn't you, at some level, reconcile these in order to get any value from the conceptual model?

2) How do you get management to pay for developing something (i.e. a conceptual model) that could be big and expensive yet is so far from the physical level?

3) Regarding your point, "Relationships between non-key attributes in an entity", isn't the relationship inherent in that these two items (total price & foreign key relationship to denomination) appear on the same record?

4) Regarding your point about code tables, aren't the business concepts they represent inherent just in the fact that they exist and are modeled?

5) Finally, can you provide some samples of the types of documentation you've used to support your conceptual models?

Thanks!

-- Ben

Posted by Benjamin T | Wednesday, April 11 2012 at 10:36AM ET
Interesting idea for discussing: Conceptual model is business metadata with taxonomy, categorization, business rules and relationship semantic, isn't it ?

Thanks, Simon

Posted by Semion I | Thursday, April 12 2012 at 5:29AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Are you actively evaluating master data management technologies and their ability to scale and support emerging trends around big data, social and mobile?

Yes 61%
No 23%
Don't Know 9%
Not Applicable 6%

 

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.