JUL 15, 2009 5:13am ET

Related Links

Microsoft CEO Nadella Unveils Data-Analysis Tools for Companies
April 17, 2014
Gartner: CEOs Focus on Tech-Related Business Growth in 2014
April 17, 2014
Why You Need A Chief Information Security Officer
April 16, 2014

Web Seminars

April 29: Create a data protection strategy with open, software-defined storage
April 29, 2014
New Best Practices To Manage Customer Information
May 7, 2014
May 13: Cost-effective, scale-out backup in 1 solution
May 13, 2014

EHR Group to Feds: Keep CCHIT

Print
Reprints
Email

The Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology should be the sole certifying entity for EHRs, according to the HIMSS Electronic Health Record Association.

The trade group of EHR vendors on July 13 sent a comment letter to the HIT Policy Committee's certification/adoption workgroup. The committee is developing recommendations to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on numerous issues related to provisions of the economic stimulus law, widespread adoption of EHRs and development of a national health information network.

"Given time constraints and CCHIT's experience in certifying EHRs, the Association supports CCHIT as the single certifying entity to avoid duplication of effort, unnecessary expense and confusion in the market," according to the comment letter. "To avoid market confusion and enhance consistency, we prefer that there be one single certifying body. In any event, certification should be based on a common set of certification criteria."

The EHR association is within the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, which was a co-founder of CCHIT. The association's letter addresses specific questions that the HIT Policy Committee's certification/adoption workgroup is asking industry stakeholders.

Asked if certification should be viewed as a "seal of approval" process, the association replies: "No, to the extent that a 'seal of approval' implies endorsement of the product. Certification should indicate that the product meets certification criteria indicating that it is a qualified, comprehensive EHR and is capable of enabling providers to achieve 'meaningful use' requirements."

The complete comment letter is available at himssehra.org/ASP/statements.asp.

This article can also be found at HealthDataManagement.com.

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?

Filed under:

Advertisement

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Are you actively evaluating master data management technologies and their ability to scale and support emerging trends around big data, social and mobile?

Yes 61%
No 23%
Don't Know 9%
Not Applicable 6%

 

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.