JAN 3, 2008 3:13am ET

Related Links

C-Suite Tweets about Profit Performance
June 4, 2014
Analytics: Needing to Know or Wanting to Know?
April 9, 2014
The Many Rooms of the Business Analytics Mansion
November 6, 2013

Web Seminars

How Intelligent Digital Self-Service with Customer Analytics Can Lower Costs and Raise Revenue
Available On Demand
Improve Omni-channel Shopping Experience with Product Information Management
August 21, 2014

Interview with a CEO You Might Want to Work For

Print
Reprints
Email

Have you ever worked for an organization where you doubted the leadership capability of your CEO, managing director, division president or head of your agency? Have you ever been disturbed that your organization is not living up to its full potential, in terms of its enterprise-wide performance management? Imagine that I am a journalist. How would you enjoy working for an organization whose leader answered my interview questions as follows?

 

Gary Cokins: How does your organization view quality and waste?

 

The CEO: The quality community often provides lists of the five or so quality problems, such as nonconformance to product design specifications or insufficient focus on customer service. These lists tend to omit a much more critical deficiency: the inability to enable employees to achieve their full potential to contribute toward the organization’s strategic goals. This is a huge waste – but also an opportunity. My position is that our managers’ main function is to unleash the power and intellect of our employees.

 

GC: How have you created a work environment that makes this possible?

 

CEO: I set the tone at the top, as a role model, by placing a high priority on three character traits: trust, a high tolerance for dissent and innovation. Their combination is potent in a positive way. Without trust, employees do not feel they are adequately involved in decision making. Without allowing a time period for dissent, employees will not feel there is an opportunity for their opinions to be considered. Without innovation, others will leave us behind.

 

GC: This sounds like you are a big advocate of employee empowerment, but can’t it lead to chaos from employee teams exhibiting departmental self-interests rather than a unified interest in your organization as a whole?

 

CEO: Conflict and tension is natural in all organizations. There are always trade-offs, and as a leader, I struggle to properly balance multiple dimensions such as how to improve customer service levels and cost-saving process efficiencies while restricted to financial budget constraints and profit targets. I constantly assess our risk management with our risk appetite. My belief is that the primary role of my executive team is to set direction, and secondarily to hire, grow and retain excellent employees. Empowered and involved, then our employees are tasked to determine how we best follow our strategic direction. An autocratic command-and-control style of management no longer works. My managers and employee teams decide which initiatives are required and which processes we must excel at. I then assure protected financial funding of their projects and process improvements – regardless of a temporary dip in our short-term financial results. We must put our money where our strategy is.

 

GC: You sidestepped my question. How do you unify your organization?

 

CEO: It’s basic. My executive team communicates our strategy with a strategy map, then our workforce constructs and continuously modifies our balanced scorecard of initiatives, key processes and associated performance measures derived from our strategy map. This aligns our employees’ priorities, plans and actions with our strategy. With the cascading cause-and-effect linkage of strategic objectives from our strategy map, the tension and conflict I mentioned becomes self-balancing. Our measurements are critical. You get what you measure.

 

GC: How do you motivate employees?

 

CEO: Leaders like me must motivate through communicating vision and providing inspiration. Not all executives do this well. Many do it poorly. But, to get true organizational traction, we link financial bonuses for all employees in a large part to the performance indicators against targets from their cascaded scorecards. Their financial bonuses are also augmented by traditional soft and subjective assessments, such as their personal growth and attitude toward working together cohesively.

 

GC: How are you compensated? Are you the typical CEO rewarded handsomely sometimes despite a waning enterprise financial performance and associated shareholder wealth destruction?

 

CEO: The controversial and inflationary run up of CEO financial rewards is disheartening to employees everywhere, and some blame goes to the guilt-creating executive compensation consultants who circulate the same PowerPoint presentation to boards of directors that conclude with, “Do you want your CEO to be paid in the bottom half of CEOs in your industry?” There must always be a bottom half. My compensation is radically different by being directly based on the performance of my direct reports in marketing, sales, production, service delivery and administration. It’s straightforward. My reward entirely depends on their performance. My executive team’s bonuses are tied to their balanced scorecard key performance indicators (KPIs), and my bonus is a weighted formula from their bonuses. That motivates me to remove obstacles that prevent them from achieving their objectives and to facilitate the conflicts among them. It is a closed loop.    

 

GC: OK. So, monitoring the KPI dials of your balanced scorecard is obviously important, but how do you move the financial and nonfinancial dials to achieve or surpass your organizational targets that in turn ideally realize your strategy, vision and mission?

 

CEO: That is where business intelligence (BI) and performance management fit in. Over a decade ago, we implemented the compulsory transaction-based systems like enterprise resource planning (ERP) and customer relationship management (CRM) software. But we realized that type of software does not fulfill its promise of performance lift and ROI. It merely kept us at parity with our competitors. We rocketed beyond by implementing and integrating the decision support methodologies with modeling techniques and their supporting technologies. We view employee competency with analytics of all flavors – and particularly predictive analytics – as our means to a sustainable competitive advantage. We have shifted from focusing on control to anticipatory planning so we can be proactive, not reactive.     

 

GC: One final question. Are you winning?

 

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?

Advertisement

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.