A few weeks ago, I was a bit frustrated with one of my college-attending sons. He had emailed a term paper for me to edit that was due the following day. As I started reading, it became clear the paper wasn't ready for final review. As best I could figure, he'd spent the previous 24 hours feverishly drafting the 15 page document, probably realizing at the end it needed more work than he had time remaining. My review was less edit than critique, indicating I thought it still needed work, which I'm sure didn't please the harried student. The main take-away chide: for a paper this length, always allow at least of week of aggregate writing time to include a minimum of three separate writing sessions. Each session provides a “new” set of eyes, much like a peer review. My son muddled through, actually turning out a pretty good piece, even as I conceded his next paper would suffer a similar fate.
All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:
- Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
- Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
- Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
- Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
- Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!