The Forrester Muse
for Information Management Blogs
DEC 17, 2012 4:24pm ET

Blogroll

blog

What Comes First in Good BPM Design?

Print
Reprints
Email

Lately, I've become obsessed with evaluating the linkage between good process design and good experience design. This obsession was initially sparked by the primary research I did earlier this year around reinventing and redesigning business processes for mobile. The mobile imperative is driving a laser focus for companies to create exceptional user experiences for customers, employees, and partners.  

But this laser focus on exceptional design does not only extend to the application development world. This drive for exceptional user experience is also radically changing the way companies approach business process design. 

As I have interviewed BPM teams where user experience plays a large role in driving specific process change, some highlighted that they see experience design playing a greater role in driving process change than the actual process modeling and analysis aspects of process improvement.  I am beginning to refer to this approach as "Experience First." Instead of putting the process model first and giving the process model highest importance, these teams put experience design first and then optimize and transform underlying business process to deliver on the desired experience. Although this sounds subtle, it is a radical shift for BPM teams; since most teams have adopted methodologies and tools that are heavy on process modeling, and give little weight to the overall process experience (i.e., the experience that the user has when completing the process).

Teams adopting this "Experience First" approach to BPM realize that combining a beautiful process model with a poorly designed experience still leads to limited adoption of the process solution, resulting in end users turning to alternative channels for completing business process steps and activities.

Recently, I interviewed IBM's Phil Gilbert on the impact of experience design and design thinking on BPM.  Many of you know Phil from his role as the President and CTO of Lombardi; and also through IBM’s acquisition of Lombardi, in his role as Vice President for BPM, leading IBM's BPM strategy and direction.  More recently, Phil stepped into a new leadership role within IBM, launching a new group that will focus on product design and the user experience across IBM's portfolio of applications. During our interview, Phil outlined the concept of "Design Thinking" and sketched out specific strategies and techniques for applying experience design to drive a different approach for optimizing and transforming business processes.

Click here and scroll down the page to listen to Clay’s podcast.

After you listen to the podcast, let me know what you think. Do you believe "Design Thinking" will change the way we approach business process? Is your team struggling with adopting more of an "Experience First" approach to BPM?  Are the BPM tools and methods you are using able to embrace experience design as a primary focal point for driving process improvements? 

This blog originally appeared at Forrester Research.

Advertisement

Comments (3)
My conclusion from this article is that the process is iterative. Further, users can't, in the abstract, express their requirements very well and only when taken through the UI and ideally an early prototype will they be able to express the mechanics they envision. The challenge with ignoring the process model is that the process enforces rules and data integrity that have varying degrees of rigidity. Both must influence the result, right?
Posted by Michael L | Wednesday, December 19 2012 at 12:10PM ET
Much like website design has changed radically over the years from a developers vision of an efficient website, to an improved user experience (increasing time on site and number of pages viewed during a visit as well as a higher rate of return visits), business processes must adapt from their academic approach to optimum pathways to engaging user experiences. The underlying processes can (and in my opinion - must) be adaptable to account for actual human interaction rather than a model conceived by a process expert.
Posted by Mike W | Thursday, December 20 2012 at 10:28AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Blog Archive for Clay Richardson

Transforming Customer Experience and Innovation: What’s Your Approach?
Beyond the BPM Culture Wars
Run BPM Like a Lean Startup
A Slice of Mobile Business Process Problems
4 C’s of Big Data Process

More from Clay Richardson »

Blog Index »

Where do young IT professionals (30 and under) obtain information to aid with daily role responsibilities and career development?

Trade publication websites 14%
Social media 23%
Vendor websites 4%
Vendor/community forums 7%
Newsletters 1%
Trade conferences/meetups 2%
RSS feeds 6%
Web search 44%

 

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.