JUL 15, 2011 4:10pm ET

Related Links

Data Governance: The Silent Hero to Achieving MDM Triumph
August 20, 2014
Six Rules to Improve Your Odds of Governance Success
August 14, 2014
Casework for Data Governance
June 25, 2014

Web Seminars

Why Data Virtualization Can Save the Data Warehouse
September 17, 2014
Essential Guide to Using Data Virtualization for Big Data Analytics
September 24, 2014

Governance For Information Too?

Print
Reprints
Email

In the same week I was pinged by a reader asking us where we stood on "information governance" I answered a post on the same question in LinkedIn that asked about the "emergence of information governance" and "how is it different from data governance?"

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?

Advertisement

Comments (12)
If data governance and information governance is so important how we didn't have "document governance", "file cabinet governance" or "gossip governance" (the precursor to blogs, twitters and Facebook.

The term data governance and now information governance is a pretentious, opaque and meaningless term just like its predecessor, corporate governance.

It's a term that is used to hide the fact that managing data and preventing fraud is a difficult task. The term governance implies the softer side of management. It appeals to our democratic spirit. It sounds so much better than; "data rules and regulations" or "data dictatorship".

At this point spending time discussing the meaning of the term is a waste of effort. Let's get back to data management and leave the existential meanings to philosophers. .

Posted by Richard O | Monday, July 18 2011 at 11:20AM ET
@Keep it Simple

Besides what's said above, I think you're really missing the point of data governance, which in no way is opaque or meaningless. Have a look at the DAMA dictionary or elsewhere for some very clear explanation. Without policies, data definition access,update rights and ownership an organization can never be compliant or agree on what data means or what it identifies (aka, what is a customer?). Governance is data quality, process efficiency and much more. In the absence of governance you can argue that whoever manages data is already setting policy in the company. Or, if everyone follows there own policy, data can never be reconciled, questions can never be answered with accuracy and silos of people and processes proliferate and degade the data further. Data management and information management are practices unto themselves and serve a different purpose.

Jim E.

Posted by Jim E | Monday, July 18 2011 at 11:39AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.