for Information Management Blogs
APR 1, 2010 5:08am ET

Blogroll

I Forget: What's In-Memory?

Print
Reprints
Email

In-memory analytics are all a buzz for multiple reasons. Speed of querying, reporting and analysis is just one. Flexibility, agility, rapid prototyping are others. While there are many more reasons, not all in-memory approaches are created equal. Let’s look at the five options buyers have today:

1. In-memory OLAP. Classic MOLAP cube loaded entirely in memory.

Vendors: IBM Cognos TM1, Actuate BIRT

Pros:

  • Fast reporting, querying and analysis, because the entire model and data are all in memory
  • Ability to write back
  • Accessible by 3rd party MDX tools (IBM Cognos TM1 specifically)

Cons:

  • Requires traditional multidimensional data modeling.
  • Limited to single physical memory space (theoretical limit of 3TB, but we haven’t seen production implementations of more than 300GB – this applies to the other in-memory solutions as well)

2. In-memory ROLAP. ROLAP metadata loaded entirely in memory.

Vendors: MicroStrategy

Pros:

  • Speeds up reporting, querying and analysis, because metadata is all in memory
  • Not limited by physical memory

Cons:

  • Only metadata, not entire data model is in memory, although MicroStrategy can build complete cubes from the subset of data held entirely in memory
  • Requires traditional multidimensional data modeling

3. In-memory inverted index. Index (with data) loaded into memory.

Vendors: SAP BusinessObjects (BI Accelerator), Endeca

Pros:

  • Fast reporting, querying and analysis, because the entire index is in memory
  • Less modelling required than an OLAP-based solution

Cons:

  • Limited by physical memory
  • Some index modelling still required
  • Reporting and analysis limited to entity relationships built in index

4. In-memory associative index. An array/index with every entity/attribute correlated to every other entity/attribute.

Vendors: QlikView, TIBCO Spotfire, Advizor Solutions (also OEMd by Information Builders)

Pros:

  • Fast reporting, querying and analysis, because the entire index is in memory
  • Less modelling required than an OLAP based solution
  • Reporting, querying, analysis can be done without any model constraints, for example any attribute can be instantly reused as fact or as a dimension. Every query with an inner-join can also show results of an outer join on every column.

Cons:

  • Limited by physical memory
  • Some scripting/modelling still required to load the data

5. In-memory spreadsheet. Spreadsheet like array loaded entirely into memory.

Vendors: Microsoft (PowerPivot)

Pros:

  • Fast reporting, querying and analysis, because the entire spreadsheet is in memory
  • No modelling required
  • Reporting and analysis are as simple as sorting and filtering a spreadsheet

Cons:

  • Limited by physical memory

What did I miss and what did I get wrong - comments?

Boris also blogs at http://blogs.forrester.com/boris_evelson/.

Filed under:

Advertisement

Comments (13)
QlikView belongs in your list. Most would agree it has much shorter implementation times; bad for consultants, great for buyers. Excellent compression model and business graphics-friendly UI.
Posted by Mark U | Friday, April 02 2010 at 10:55AM ET
To clarify, I meant that it deserved a bullet by itself, mainly because of its UI (It's n your list already with Tibco et al).
Posted by Mark U | Friday, April 02 2010 at 10:58AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Blog Archive for Boris Evelson

Why Don’t We Measure BI Performance?
Looking for BI Talent? You’re Not Alone
Evaluating BI for Cloud and Mobile
Help Wanted: Defining a Business Intelligence Leader
Searching for Measures of Business Intelligence Performance

More from Boris Evelson »

Blog Index »

Where do young IT professionals (30 and under) obtain information to aid with daily role responsibilities and career development?

Trade publication websites 14%
Social media 23%
Vendor websites 4%
Vendor/community forums 7%
Newsletters 1%
Trade conferences/meetups 2%
RSS feeds 6%
Web search 44%

 

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.