AUG 2, 2011 9:18am ET

Related Links

Majority of Organizations Claim ‘Advanced’ Data Environments, Practices
June 5, 2014
C-Suite Tweets about Profit Performance
June 4, 2014
Cue the Data Storytellers: The Data Industry’s Next Big Stars
May 20, 2014

Web Seminars

How Customer Analytics Can Lower Costs and Raise Revenue
July 29, 2014
Improve Omni-channel Shopping Experience with Product Information Management
August 21, 2014

Are You Turning Ugly Data Into Cute Information?


Sometimes the ways of the data force are difficult to understand precisely because they are sometimes difficult to see.

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?


Comments (2)
Beauty is sensed by the eyes, music sensed by the ears and both are appreciated (or not) by the mind.

Truth and data are not sensed but perceived or experienced by the mind. Humans have no sensors for data. Data has no physical, chemical or biological characteristics to be sensed. Data isn't ugly, cute, beautiful or hideous. That is why data quality is such an amorphous concept. Yet we keep trying to sense data quality using tools and techniques from entity domains that have physical proprieties like cars and toasters.

How do we measure truth?

One often suggested quality characteristic for data is its representation of reality. How do you measure this quality characteristic? What is reality? Does a customer name present the reality of a customer?

Converting ugly data to cute data or making data presentable is more of an artistic rather than scientific proces so perhaps we should focus on the color palette we use to represent the data rather than attempting to "clean" the data. Present the data as is, with all its flaws and defects for all to see. Only then can we begin to "sense" how people experience that data.

Posted by Richard O | Tuesday, August 02 2011 at 2:32PM ET
I dont agree with Keep it simple - I agree with you Jim - I have what i call the Good, the bad and the Ugly data and you have marked the ugly side correctly - these groupings help define what the problem is bad data isnt really defective its just been tainted by that ETL process with ugly (defective data) and the really ugly data poisions everything in its path. There is a behaviour and a pattern to it ... lets search deeper
Posted by jennifer o | Friday, October 14 2011 at 5:02PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.