MAY 13, 2010 8:49am ET

Related Links

IBM Introduces Watson to Consumers in Service for USAA Clients
July 23, 2014
Majority of Organizations Claim ‘Advanced’ Data Environments, Practices
June 5, 2014
C-Suite Tweets about Profit Performance
June 4, 2014

Web Seminars

How Intelligent Digital Self-Service with Customer Analytics Can Lower Costs and Raise Revenue
July 29, 2014
Improve Omni-channel Shopping Experience with Product Information Management
August 21, 2014

BI Implications Of SAP-Sybase Deal - Plenty

Print
Reprints
Email

The obvious:

  • SAP gets its own relational (Sybase ASE) and analytical (Sybase IQ) DBMS. Why is this a positive since SAP already has tight partnerships with major DBMS and DW vendors such as Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, Teradata, and HP? Simple. First, SAP can now control the code. Second, SAP can now potentially reduce reliance on DBMS partners, most of whom (Oracle, IBM, Microsoft) have their own full software stacks and therefore compete, often putting a strain on partnership relationships.
  • SAP also gets highly relevant (for low latency BI) and currently missing CEP technolgy from the Sybase Aleri acquisition and an OEM version of Coral8.
  • Sybase gets a badly needed BI front end on top of its Sybase IQ analytical DBMS. While Sybase is leading the market in the columnar DBMS, it is somewhat challenged selling and positioning the product with the business buyers, since they can’t really see, feel, or touch it.

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?

Filed under:

Advertisement

Comments (3)
There will be interesting implications indeed. And interesting question is how long it would take to convert "Sybase, SAP Company" into "SAP Sybase". Looking at BO acquisition - not so long. Boris, some comments: 1/ SAP has its own MaxDB database, which is pretty mature. It will be interesting to see what happen to both MaxDB and ASE long term. 2/ ERP and BW do not need to run on the same DBMS. There is no problem to run them on completely different HW/OS/DBMS without any issues. 3/ Indeed DBMS certification process for SAP is quite long and as well very expensive not only in development, but as well in support. 4/ I see it very often that people are calling TREX the DBMS, but in fact it is not. It is just a pony that learned new trick: the search engine that has been taught to select and aggregate numbers (at least in current version).

Let's see what future will bring.

Posted by Vitaliy R | Saturday, May 15 2010 at 3:55AM ET
The best thing SAP could do is acquire the most scalable solution for unstructured+structured data - BMMSoft's EDMT Server - which uses Sybase IQ and has been certified to 1 Petabyte (1,024 TB) of data and has set the world record- already in Guinness book of records. I guess BMMsoft is the best-kept secret :-), but seriously I think that would be a winning solution for SAP: The whole package IQ + BMM.
Posted by Faux S | Friday, June 04 2010 at 3:05PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.