MAR 1, 2011 9:21am ET

Related Links

Quorum, Zettaset, Others Announce New or Updated Products
August 15, 2014
Harnessing the Power of CRM Analytics
August 11, 2014
Lavastorm, Solix, Others Announce New or Updated Products
August 8, 2014

Web Seminars

Attract and Keep Shoppers with Product Information Management
August 21, 2014
Information Agility: Delivering Analytics Faster
September 17, 2014
Essential Guide to Using Data Virtualization for Big Data Analytics
September 24, 2014

Science of Business vs. Evidence-Based Management

Print
Reprints
Email

I've written a lot over the past couple of years on the science of business and evidence-based management. In my "Science of Business Manifesto" blogs a few months back, I used EBM as a synonym for the SOB, drawing on the connotations of both to the conduct of business by the rigorous formulation, measurement, testing and evaluation of alternative courses of action. But a recent interview/article in the MIT Sloan Management Review, “Matchmaking With Math: How Analytics Beats Intuition to Win Customers,” is making me question whether there might be a nuanced difference between the two that's important for BI.

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?

Advertisement

Comments (12)
I think the article hit it right on. SOB is top down. EBM is bottom up. There is likely an interplay between them. SOB gives you a framework within which to create tests for hypotheses. EBM provides the ability to generate new data-driven hypotheses while also measuring planned test results.
Posted by David R | Thursday, March 03 2011 at 9:17AM ET
There is more than one approach to doing science. The initial work done at Assurant has much in common with observational studies; finding what is really going on, independent of any particular hypothesis about why or how reality is what it is. Many practical advances can be made based on observation, even without an underlying theory.
Posted by Julian S | Monday, February 17 2014 at 2:28PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.