for Information Management Blogs
JUL 29, 2011 11:25am ET

Blogroll

BI Vendors: Eat Your Own Dog Food

Print
Reprints
Email

Would you trust a car salesman who's not himself driving a type of car he's trying to sell you? Would you trust a nutritionist or a dietitian who's not in a good shape? You probably won't. There are two things I suggest that we all ask of BI vendors if they:

  1. Use their own BI tools to run their own company. Next time you interview a BI vendor ask for a proof that their own CxOs and all other strategic and tactical decisions makers are using their own tools. I know of some cases where they don't. Then how can a vendor convince you to buy their solutions if they haven't convinced their own people?
  2. Adhere to the same best practices they suggest you implement using their tools/solutions. Transparency is one of them. One of the top use cases for enterprise BI is transparency - full visibility into companies processes, people, policies, rules, transactions, etc.

Unfortunately, my current BI Pricing research is showing a broad range of transparency (or non transparency) from BI vendors themselves. Some vendors welcomed our research RFI and are happily providing all the info we requested. Some are less transparent and are insisting that we only publish price ranges or comparative analysis (who's more/less expensive) without showing their exact quotes. Yet, some others have declined to participate.

For the sake of not creating a precedent I won't call out any specific names here, nor in our upcoming report. But IMHO how transparent a vendor is, the way a vendor treats analysts, responds to their RFIs, etc is directly related to the way a vendor is transparent or not with a customer and the way a vendor treats its customers. You may draw your own conclusions from that statement
:-)

In addition to the pricing research we will also kick of a customer survey asking them about their experience with the total cost of ownership of their BI applications. Look forward to the results and the report by the end of September.

This blog originally appeared at The Forrester Muse.

Advertisement

Comments (2)
Readers should remember that analysts are not paying customers. Greater weight should be given to the experiences of real customers who have negotiated through difficult support issues and at least one upgrade cycle.
Posted by Paul W | Monday, August 01 2011 at 11:20AM ET
I think Boris raises a very good point. Out of graduate school I got a job at Ford Motor but drove to work in my new Chevrolet. I was harassed by management to buy a new car. So why doesn't Microsoft executives force their IT dept to use SSIS for their data warehouse ETL. Probably because they have too many Oracle applications running the business and SSIS is a lightweight very technical tool for SQL Server techies. Let's ask Microsoft the question that Boris raises.
Posted by bob p | Monday, August 01 2011 at 11:43AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Blog Archive for Boris Evelson

Why Don’t We Measure BI Performance?
Looking for BI Talent? You’re Not Alone
Evaluating BI for Cloud and Mobile
Help Wanted: Defining a Business Intelligence Leader
Searching for Measures of Business Intelligence Performance

More from Boris Evelson »

Blog Index »

Where do young IT professionals (30 and under) obtain information to aid with daily role responsibilities and career development?

Trade publication websites 14%
Social media 23%
Vendor websites 4%
Vendor/community forums 7%
Newsletters 1%
Trade conferences/meetups 2%
RSS feeds 6%
Web search 44%

 

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.