The Forrester Muse
APR 3, 2013 11:57am ET

Related Links

Beyond Big Data: Consider the Impact of Emerging Technologies on Data Management
September 19, 2014
Stop Governing Your Data - Start Leading Data Behaviors and Outcomes
September 18, 2014
Ellison Becomes Oracle Chairman as Catz, Hurd Split CEO Job
September 18, 2014

Web Seminars

Essential Guide to Using Data Virtualization for Big Data Analytics
September 24, 2014
Integrating Relational Database Data with NoSQL Database Data
October 23, 2014

Without Data Management Standards - Anarchy!


When I posted a blog on Don’t Establish Data Management Standards (it was also on Information Management's website as Data Management Standards are a Barrier) I expected some resistance.  I mean, why post a blog and not have the courage to be provocative, right? 

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?


Comments (2)
Hi Michele,

I'm behind you all the way. The old ways die hard.

Models are representations of things that provide utility. We need to manage one or more mappings to the models and allow for both variants and change, while preserving controls and history.

The defenders for models can only feel satisfied if they close their eyes to all of the problems of Enterprise IT. Look at the rigidly structured applications, the lack of enterprise-wide interoperability, all of the shadow systems, and all of the BS records that their models bring forth.

That's the problem with conventional IT thinking everyone is so specialized they can't see the forest for the trees. They just see their part and want it perfectly controlled at any cost.

Classic modular reductionism. Sad, but keep up the good fight and take solace that their ideas will end up on the ash heap of history.

Best, Dave Duggal

Posted by Dave D | Friday, April 05 2013 at 9:40AM ET
Thanks Michelle - this clarification goes well as a companion-piece to your earlier post. (In fact, I'd say the argument is only made and complete with both facets presented.)

I've always advocated for standards as a foundation and framework, but standards need to be adaptive and responsive to changing circumstances. A standard that can't deal with changing needs is not a standard worth investing in; if it doesn't actively support achievement of business value, then it's worse than worthless.

Posted by Alan D | Sunday, April 07 2013 at 10:57PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.