MAR 12, 2012 9:19am ET

Related Links

Big Data Gets Bigger Footprint in Insurance
September 16, 2014
Data Acceleration: A Technology Architecture for High Speed Insights
September 12, 2014
How Banks Are Using Big Data to Set Deposit Rates
September 8, 2014

Web Seminars

Why Data Virtualization Can Save the Data Warehouse
September 17, 2014
Essential Guide to Using Data Virtualization for Big Data Analytics
September 24, 2014

Thoughts on Geospatial

Print
Reprints
Email

I had a chance to listen back to our DM Radio mashup last week about geospatial data, the use of geographic information systems (GIS) and the arrival of big data and analytics.

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Information Management articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to:

  • Full access to information-management.com including all searchable archived content
  • Exclusive E-Newsletters delivering the latest headlines to your inbox
  • Access to White Papers, Web Seminars, and Blog Discussions
  • Discounts to upcoming conferences & events
  • Uninterrupted access to all sponsored content, and MORE!

Already Registered?

Advertisement

Comments (2)
I didn't hear the program, so may be missing something. But, the published excerpts here indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of GIS. The technology is fundamentally a data management technology, with capabilities for handling locational attributes. The map (whether on screen or printed/plotted onto paper) is just a specific type of report on the data contents.

The takeaway points for data integration are: (1) Almost every data set includes some kind of locational attribution -- the GIS community often says "80%" of all data. (2) Often the only attribution in common between two data sets to be integrated will be some variation of location, such as addresses. (3) Problems arise when the locational attribution are not semantically comparable, such as delivery address vs billing address, or at different levels of precision, such as address vs jurisdiction.

Posted by Mike W | Thursday, March 15 2012 at 3:07PM ET
Just identifying and extracting the location information doesn't go far enough. Verifying that the address really exists and then formatting the address according to standards makes it usable. Comparing different bits of information without that step may not be completely useless but would certainly lead to results that were of lower quality than could otherwise be achieved.
Posted by Geoff R | Tuesday, March 20 2012 at 3:40PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.